Saturday, November 10, 2007
HOME EQUITY LOAN
A home equity loan (sometimes abbreviated HEL) is a type of loan in which the borrower uses the equity in their home as collateral. These loans are sometimes useful to help finance major home repairs, medical bills or college education. A home equity loan creates a lien against the borrower's house, and reduces actual home equity.
Home equity loans are most commonly second position liens (second trust deed), although they can be held in first or, less commonly, third position. Most home equity loans require good to excellent credit history, and reasonable loan-to-value and combined loan-to-value ratios. Home equity loans come in two types, closed end and open end.
Both are usually referred to as second mortgages, because they are secured against the value of the property, just like a traditional mortgage. Home equity loans and lines of credit are usually, but not always, for a shorter term than first mortgages. In the United States, it is sometimes possible to deduct home equity loan interest on one's personal income taxes.
Closed end home equity loanThe borrower receives a lump sum at the time of the closing and cannot borrow further. The maximum amount of money that can be borrowed is determined by variables including credit history, income, and the appraised value of the collateral, among others. It is common to be able to borrow up to 100% of the appraised value of the home, less any liens, although there are lenders that will go above 100% when doing over-equity loans. However, state law governs in this area; for example, Texas (which was, for many years, the only state to not allow home equity loans) only allows borrowing up to 80% of equity.
Closed-end home equity loans generally have fixed rates and can be amortized for periods usually up to 15 years. Some home equity loans offer reduced amortization whereby at the end of the term, a balloon payment is due. These larger lump-sum payments can be avoided by paying above the minimum payment or refinancing the loan.
Open end home equity loanThis is a revolving credit loan, also referred to as a home equity line of credit (HELOC), where the borrower can choose when and how often to borrow against the equity in the property, with the lender setting an initial limit to the credit line based on criteria similar to those used for closed-end loans. Like the closed-end loan, it may be possible to borrow up to 100% of the value of a home, less any liens. These lines of credit are available up to 30 years, usually at a variable interest rate. The minimum monthly payment can be as low as only the interest that is due.
Typically, the interest rate is based on the Prime rate plus a margin.
Home Equity Loan FeesHere is a brief list of possible fees that may apply to your home equity loan: Appraisal fees, originator fees, title fees, stamp duties, arrangement fees, closing fees, early pay-off and other costs are often included in loans. Surveyor and conveyor or valuation fees may also apply to loans, some may be waived. The survey or conveyor and valuation costs can often be reduced, provided you find your own licensed surveyor to inspect the property considered for purchase. The title charges in secondary mortgages or equity loans are often fees for renewing the title information. Most loans will have fees of some sort, so make sure you read and ask several questions about the fees that are charged.
Tuesday, November 6, 2007
E-Loan
E-Loan, Inc.
Type Private
Founded 1997
Founder Janina Pawlowski and Chris Larsen
Headquarters Pleasanton, CA
Key people Mark Lefanowicz, President
Industry Financial Services
Products Auto Loans
Mortgage Loans
Mortgage Refinance Loans
Home Equity Loans
Savings & CDs
Employees 950
Parent Popular, Inc.
Slogan Radically Simple
Website www.eloan.com
E-Loan, Inc. is a financial services company that offers home mortgage, home equity, and auto loans,
along with online high yield savings and certificates of deposit (CDs).
E-LOAN® is currently headquartered in Pleasanton, CA, and employs more than 950 people. As of October
2006, the company has funded over $32 billion in loans.
History
Founded in 1997 by Janina Pawlowski and Chris Larsen, E-Loan, Inc. was established to provide customers
with access to mortgage loans over the Internet.
As the company continued to evolve, more products and enhancements were introduced. In 1998, E-LOAN
launched E-Track, a proprietary system that allows borrowers to securely check the status of their loans
online.
In 2000, E-LOAN became the first company to provide consumers with free access to their credit scores,
allowing customers to check for possible incidents of identity theft or erroneous entries of credit
debt. This was introduced at a time when many financial companies were reluctant to release this
information.
Buoyed by this success, but still determined to improve public credit disclosures throughout the nation,
Larsen helped form “Californians for Privacy Now” to lead the fight for stricter financial privacy
protection. After collecting over 600,000 signatures, the measure was placed on the California ballot
and passed into law in 2003.
Ownership of the company changed in 2005 when Popular, Inc. acquired E-Loan, Inc.
In 2006, E-LOAN branched out into online savings accounts and CDs, promising their CD rates would be
among the highest in the nation.
Core Products
Mortgage Loans
E-LOAN offers several different types of mortgages, including 40, 30, 20 and 15-year loans.
Other loan choices include those with zero down or no PMI (Private Mortgage Insurance). These remain
popular among customers financing a home loan in locations where housing costs remain above the national
average.
Refinance Loans
E-LOAN offers refinancing options for customers searching for a better rate, extra cash, or both.
Customers can apply for a mortgage refinance with a cash-out refinance or a home equity loan.
E-LOAN provides two types of home equity loans:
* A home equity line of credit, also known as a HELOC, which extends a credit line that can be
accessed whenever the borrower chooses.
* A home equity loan or “second mortgage,” which provides cash in a lump sum while retaining the
borrower’s existing first mortgage.
Vehicle Loans
E-LOAN also provides car, truck, and motorcycle loans for both dealers and non-dealers (private party).
Loans for lease buyouts are also available, along with auto refinance loans for borrowers searching for
better rates than their current car loans.
E-LOAN provides approved vehicle loan applicants with a “PowerCheck®,” which works much like a regular
check.
Online Savings and CDs
Differing from its other loan products, E-LOAN also offers high yield savings and CDs. Current rates are
listed on the company’s Web site at http://www.eloan.com/savings
Awards
Since its inception, E-LOAN has garnered various awards for privacy and ease-of-use. Some of these
include:
* Best Overall in Best Practices in 2007 Mortgage Scorecard by Keynote_Systems
* Rated # 1 in Web Excellence for Mortgage (July 2006)
* Top Financial Company for Privacy by TRUSTe and the Ponemon Institute (March 2006)
* Ranked #3 in Privacy by The Customer Respect Group (August 2005)
* Highest Customer Respect Rating (March 2005)
* Easiest Site For Consumers to Use (March 2004)
* Certificate for E-LOAN as an Upfront Mortgage Lender
* COMPUTERWORLD’s Safest Places On the Web article
External Links
* www.eloan.com (Homepage)
* savings.eloan.com/savings (Savings & CDs)
* www.eloan.com.au (E-LOAN Australia Homepage: Independently operated)
Type Private
Founded 1997
Founder Janina Pawlowski and Chris Larsen
Headquarters Pleasanton, CA
Key people Mark Lefanowicz, President
Industry Financial Services
Products Auto Loans
Mortgage Loans
Mortgage Refinance Loans
Home Equity Loans
Savings & CDs
Employees 950
Parent Popular, Inc.
Slogan Radically Simple
Website www.eloan.com
E-Loan, Inc. is a financial services company that offers home mortgage, home equity, and auto loans,
along with online high yield savings and certificates of deposit (CDs).
E-LOAN® is currently headquartered in Pleasanton, CA, and employs more than 950 people. As of October
2006, the company has funded over $32 billion in loans.
History
Founded in 1997 by Janina Pawlowski and Chris Larsen, E-Loan, Inc. was established to provide customers
with access to mortgage loans over the Internet.
As the company continued to evolve, more products and enhancements were introduced. In 1998, E-LOAN
launched E-Track, a proprietary system that allows borrowers to securely check the status of their loans
online.
In 2000, E-LOAN became the first company to provide consumers with free access to their credit scores,
allowing customers to check for possible incidents of identity theft or erroneous entries of credit
debt. This was introduced at a time when many financial companies were reluctant to release this
information.
Buoyed by this success, but still determined to improve public credit disclosures throughout the nation,
Larsen helped form “Californians for Privacy Now” to lead the fight for stricter financial privacy
protection. After collecting over 600,000 signatures, the measure was placed on the California ballot
and passed into law in 2003.
Ownership of the company changed in 2005 when Popular, Inc. acquired E-Loan, Inc.
In 2006, E-LOAN branched out into online savings accounts and CDs, promising their CD rates would be
among the highest in the nation.
Core Products
Mortgage Loans
E-LOAN offers several different types of mortgages, including 40, 30, 20 and 15-year loans.
Other loan choices include those with zero down or no PMI (Private Mortgage Insurance). These remain
popular among customers financing a home loan in locations where housing costs remain above the national
average.
Refinance Loans
E-LOAN offers refinancing options for customers searching for a better rate, extra cash, or both.
Customers can apply for a mortgage refinance with a cash-out refinance or a home equity loan.
E-LOAN provides two types of home equity loans:
* A home equity line of credit, also known as a HELOC, which extends a credit line that can be
accessed whenever the borrower chooses.
* A home equity loan or “second mortgage,” which provides cash in a lump sum while retaining the
borrower’s existing first mortgage.
Vehicle Loans
E-LOAN also provides car, truck, and motorcycle loans for both dealers and non-dealers (private party).
Loans for lease buyouts are also available, along with auto refinance loans for borrowers searching for
better rates than their current car loans.
E-LOAN provides approved vehicle loan applicants with a “PowerCheck®,” which works much like a regular
check.
Online Savings and CDs
Differing from its other loan products, E-LOAN also offers high yield savings and CDs. Current rates are
listed on the company’s Web site at http://www.eloan.com/savings
Awards
Since its inception, E-LOAN has garnered various awards for privacy and ease-of-use. Some of these
include:
* Best Overall in Best Practices in 2007 Mortgage Scorecard by Keynote_Systems
* Rated # 1 in Web Excellence for Mortgage (July 2006)
* Top Financial Company for Privacy by TRUSTe and the Ponemon Institute (March 2006)
* Ranked #3 in Privacy by The Customer Respect Group (August 2005)
* Highest Customer Respect Rating (March 2005)
* Easiest Site For Consumers to Use (March 2004)
* Certificate for E-LOAN as an Upfront Mortgage Lender
* COMPUTERWORLD’s Safest Places On the Web article
External Links
* www.eloan.com (Homepage)
* savings.eloan.com/savings (Savings & CDs)
* www.eloan.com.au (E-LOAN Australia Homepage: Independently operated)
Equity stripping
Equity stripping, also known as equity skimming or foreclosure rescue, is any of various predatory real
estate practices aimed at vulnerable, often low-income, homeowners facing foreclosure in the United
States. Often considered a form of predatory lending, equity stripping began to spring up in the early
2000s and is conducted by investors or small companies that take properties from foreclosed homeowners
in exchange for allowing the homeowner to stay in the property as a tenant. Most often, these
transactions take advantage of uninformed, low-income homeowners. Because of the complexity of the
transaction and false assurances given by rescue artists, victims are often unaware that they are giving
away their property and equity. In recent years, several states have taken steps to confront the more
unscrupulous practices of equity stripping. Although "foreclosure reconveyance" schemes can be
beneficial and ethically conducted in some circumstances, many times the practice relies on fraud and
egregious or unmeetable terms. [1]
Term and definition
The term "equity stripping" has sometimes referred to subprime lending refinance practices that charge
excessive fees thereby "stripping the equity" out of the home. The practice more often describes
foreclosure rescue scams. While most do not consider equity stripping a form of predatory lending per
se, equity stripping is related to traditional forms of that practice. Subprime loans targeted at
vulnerable and unsophisticated homeowners often lead to foreclosure, and those victims more often fall
to equity stripping scams[2]. Additionally, some do consider equity stripping, in essence, a form of
predatory lending since the scam works essentially like a high-cost and risky refinancing. Equity
stripping, however, is conducted almost always by local agents and investors, while traditional
predatory lending is carried out by large banks or national companies.[3]
Market conditions
Trends in the United States economy have led to the growing market for foreclosure services and equity
stripping. Property values have increased dramatically from 2000-2005 [4]. However, with an increase in
values, foreclosure rates also peaked in 2001 and remained high[5], leaving numerous foreclosed
homeowners with substantial equity. With these trends, a market emerged to tap into this equity.
Scam Elements
Foreclosure
A homeowner falls behind on his mortgage payments and enters foreclosure. Foreclosure notices are
published in newspapers or distributed by reporting services to investors and rescue artists. Foreclosed
homeowners also contact lenders to inquire about refinancing options.
Solicitation
Rescue artists obtain contact information for foreclosured homeowners and make contacts personally, by
phone, or through direct mail. Some lenders and brokers will also refer foreclosed homeowners that do
not qualify for new loans to rescue artists for a commission. Rescue Artists offer the foreclosed
homeowner a "miracle refinancing" and/or say they can "save the home" from foreclosure.
Acquisition
Rescue artists arrange the closing (often delaying the date until shortly before the homeowner's removal
in order to create urgency). At the closing, the homeowner transfers title (possibly unwittingly) to the
rescue artist or an arranged investor. The rescue artist or arranged investor pays off the amount owed
in foreclosure to acquire the deed, and inherits or is paid any portion of the homeowner's remaining
equity. The rescue artist will reconvey the property back to the homeowner in the form of a lease or a
contract for deed.
Result
The homeowners remain in the home and pay rent or contract-for-deed payments (often higher than their
previous mortgage payments). They inevitably fall behind, and are evicted from their homes with very
little of their equity.
Legal Remedies
State Protections
Several states have passed laws to prevent and/or regulate equity stripping schemes. Minnesota and
Maryland passed laws in 2005 aimed at "foreclosure reconveyance" practices[6] . The state laws require
adequate disclosures, capped fees, and an ability to pay on behalf of the consumer. The statutes also
ban certain deceptive and unfair practices associated with equity stripping.[7]
Other laws regulating the activity of "foreclosure consultants" have been passed in California, Georgia,
and Missouri[8].
Additionally, state fraud and "unfair and deceptive trade practices" acts can be used when rescue
artists have misrepresented their services and the end result.[9]
Federal Protection
Since foreclosure rescue schemes are essentially refinancing loans secured by the home, consumers can
often successfully argue that disclosures required for all loans by the federal Truth in Lending Act and
the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act are necessary[10].
Non-Predatory Foreclosure Rescue
In certain circumstances, foreclosure rescue services can be beneficial to the consumer. When
refinancing options are exhausted and foreclosure proceedings have led to near eviction, a foreclosure
rescue transaction with moderate fees and full disclosures can be legally and ethically executed.
A consumer can face removal from the property and the loss of their entire equity following a
foreclosure auction. As an alternative, foreclosure rescuers have the ability to redeem the home from
foreclosure with a new mortgage of their own. For a moderate fee or portion of the existing equity, this
can keep the former homeowner in the home as a tenant while they repair their credit or increase their
income. After a given time period, the homeowner can then repurchase the property from the rescuer.
If done with full verbal and written disclosure, terms the consumer is capable of fulfilling, and
moderate total fees, foreclosure rescue can be suitable to consumers in dire situations.
This mechanism is often used by family members or friends in order to prevent the loss of a home. In
effect, the investor "lends" their good credit to the foreclosed homeowner by paying off the foreclosed
mortgage and obtaining the title to the home temporarily.
estate practices aimed at vulnerable, often low-income, homeowners facing foreclosure in the United
States. Often considered a form of predatory lending, equity stripping began to spring up in the early
2000s and is conducted by investors or small companies that take properties from foreclosed homeowners
in exchange for allowing the homeowner to stay in the property as a tenant. Most often, these
transactions take advantage of uninformed, low-income homeowners. Because of the complexity of the
transaction and false assurances given by rescue artists, victims are often unaware that they are giving
away their property and equity. In recent years, several states have taken steps to confront the more
unscrupulous practices of equity stripping. Although "foreclosure reconveyance" schemes can be
beneficial and ethically conducted in some circumstances, many times the practice relies on fraud and
egregious or unmeetable terms. [1]
Term and definition
The term "equity stripping" has sometimes referred to subprime lending refinance practices that charge
excessive fees thereby "stripping the equity" out of the home. The practice more often describes
foreclosure rescue scams. While most do not consider equity stripping a form of predatory lending per
se, equity stripping is related to traditional forms of that practice. Subprime loans targeted at
vulnerable and unsophisticated homeowners often lead to foreclosure, and those victims more often fall
to equity stripping scams[2]. Additionally, some do consider equity stripping, in essence, a form of
predatory lending since the scam works essentially like a high-cost and risky refinancing. Equity
stripping, however, is conducted almost always by local agents and investors, while traditional
predatory lending is carried out by large banks or national companies.[3]
Market conditions
Trends in the United States economy have led to the growing market for foreclosure services and equity
stripping. Property values have increased dramatically from 2000-2005 [4]. However, with an increase in
values, foreclosure rates also peaked in 2001 and remained high[5], leaving numerous foreclosed
homeowners with substantial equity. With these trends, a market emerged to tap into this equity.
Scam Elements
Foreclosure
A homeowner falls behind on his mortgage payments and enters foreclosure. Foreclosure notices are
published in newspapers or distributed by reporting services to investors and rescue artists. Foreclosed
homeowners also contact lenders to inquire about refinancing options.
Solicitation
Rescue artists obtain contact information for foreclosured homeowners and make contacts personally, by
phone, or through direct mail. Some lenders and brokers will also refer foreclosed homeowners that do
not qualify for new loans to rescue artists for a commission. Rescue Artists offer the foreclosed
homeowner a "miracle refinancing" and/or say they can "save the home" from foreclosure.
Acquisition
Rescue artists arrange the closing (often delaying the date until shortly before the homeowner's removal
in order to create urgency). At the closing, the homeowner transfers title (possibly unwittingly) to the
rescue artist or an arranged investor. The rescue artist or arranged investor pays off the amount owed
in foreclosure to acquire the deed, and inherits or is paid any portion of the homeowner's remaining
equity. The rescue artist will reconvey the property back to the homeowner in the form of a lease or a
contract for deed.
Result
The homeowners remain in the home and pay rent or contract-for-deed payments (often higher than their
previous mortgage payments). They inevitably fall behind, and are evicted from their homes with very
little of their equity.
Legal Remedies
State Protections
Several states have passed laws to prevent and/or regulate equity stripping schemes. Minnesota and
Maryland passed laws in 2005 aimed at "foreclosure reconveyance" practices[6] . The state laws require
adequate disclosures, capped fees, and an ability to pay on behalf of the consumer. The statutes also
ban certain deceptive and unfair practices associated with equity stripping.[7]
Other laws regulating the activity of "foreclosure consultants" have been passed in California, Georgia,
and Missouri[8].
Additionally, state fraud and "unfair and deceptive trade practices" acts can be used when rescue
artists have misrepresented their services and the end result.[9]
Federal Protection
Since foreclosure rescue schemes are essentially refinancing loans secured by the home, consumers can
often successfully argue that disclosures required for all loans by the federal Truth in Lending Act and
the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act are necessary[10].
Non-Predatory Foreclosure Rescue
In certain circumstances, foreclosure rescue services can be beneficial to the consumer. When
refinancing options are exhausted and foreclosure proceedings have led to near eviction, a foreclosure
rescue transaction with moderate fees and full disclosures can be legally and ethically executed.
A consumer can face removal from the property and the loss of their entire equity following a
foreclosure auction. As an alternative, foreclosure rescuers have the ability to redeem the home from
foreclosure with a new mortgage of their own. For a moderate fee or portion of the existing equity, this
can keep the former homeowner in the home as a tenant while they repair their credit or increase their
income. After a given time period, the homeowner can then repurchase the property from the rescuer.
If done with full verbal and written disclosure, terms the consumer is capable of fulfilling, and
moderate total fees, foreclosure rescue can be suitable to consumers in dire situations.
This mechanism is often used by family members or friends in order to prevent the loss of a home. In
effect, the investor "lends" their good credit to the foreclosed homeowner by paying off the foreclosed
mortgage and obtaining the title to the home temporarily.
Risks to investors
Liquidity risk
Credit/default: Default risk is generally accepted as a borrower’s inability to meet interest payment
obligations on time. For ABS, default may occur when maintenance obligations on the underlying
collateral are not sufficiently met as detailed in its prospectus. A key indicator of a particular
security’s default risk is its credit rating. Different tranches within the ABS are rated differently,
with senior classes of most issues receiving the highest rating, and subordinated classes receiving
correspondingly lower credit ratings.[7]
Event risk
Prepayment/reinvestment/early amortization: The majority of revolving ABS are subject to some degree of
early amortization risk. The risk stems from specific early amortization events or payout events that
cause the security to be paid off prematurely. Typically, payout events include insufficient payments
from the underlying borrowers, insufficient excess Fixed Income Sectors: Asset-Backed Securities spread,
a rise in the default rate on the underlying loans above a specified level, a decrease in credit
enhancements below a specific level, and bankruptcy on the part of the sponsor or servicer.[7]
Currency interest rate fluctuations: Like all fixed income securities, the prices of fixed rate ABS move
in response to changes in interest rates. Fluctuations in interest rates affect floating rate ABS prices
less than fixed rate securities, as the index against which the ABS rate adjusts will reflect interest
rate changes in the economy. Furthermore, interest rate changes may affect the prepayment rates on
underlying loans that back some types of ABS, which can affect yields. Home equity loans tend to be the
most sensitive to changes in interest rates, while auto loans, student loans, and credit cards are
generally less sensitive to interest rates.[7]
Contractual agreements
Moral hazard: Investors usually rely on the deal manager to price the securitizations’ underlying
assets. If the manager earns fees based on performance, there may be a temptation to mark up the prices
of the portfolio assets. Conflicts of interest can also arise with senior note holders when the manager
has a claim on the deal's excess spread.[9]
Servicer risk: The transfer or collection of payments may be delayed or reduced if the servicer becomes
insolvent. This risk is mitigated by having a backup servicer involved in the transaction.[7]
History
"Asset securitization began with the structured financing of mortgage pools in the 1970s. For decades
before that, banks were essentially portfolio lenders; they held loans until they matured or were paid
off. These loans were funded principally by deposits, and sometimes by debt, which was a direct
obligation of the bank (rather than a claim on specific assets). But after World War II, depository
institutions simply could not keep pace with the rising demand for housing credit. Banks, as well as
other financial intermediaries sensing a market opportunity, sought ways of increasing the sources of
mortgage funding. To attract investors, investment bankers eventually developed an investment vehicle
that isolated defined mortgage pools, segmented the credit risk, and structured the cash flows from the
underlying loans. Although it took several years to develop efficient mortgage securitization
structures, loan originators quickly realized the process was readily transferable to other types of
loans as well."[4]
In February 1970, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development created the transaction using a
mortgage-backed security. The Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA or Ginnie Mae) sold
securities backed by a portfolio of mortgage loans. [10]
To facilitate the securitization of non-mortgage assets, businesses substituted private credit
enhancements. First, they over-collateralized pools of assets; shortly thereafter, they improved third-
party and structural enhancements. In 1985, securitization techniques that had been developed in the
mortgage market were applied for the first time to a class of non-mortgage assets — automobile loans. A
pool of assets second only to mortgages in volume, auto loans were a good match for structured finance;
their maturities, considerably shorter than those of mortgages, made the timing of cash flows more
predictable, and their long statistical histories of performance gave investors confidence.[4]
This early auto loan deal was a $60 million securitization originated by Marine Midland Bank and
securitized in 1985 by the Certificate for Automobile Receivables Trust (CARS, 1985-1).[11]
The first significant bank credit card sale came to market in 1986 with a private placement of $50
million of outstanding bank card loans. This transaction demonstrated to investors that, if the yields
were high enough, loan pools could support asset sales with higher expected losses and administrative
costs than was true within the mortgage market. Sales of this type — with no contractual obligation by
the seller to provide recourse — allowed banks to receive sales treatment for accounting and regulatory
purposes (easing balance sheet and capital constraints), while at the same time allowing them to retain
origination and servicing fees. After the success of this initial transaction, investors grew to accept
credit card receivables as collateral, and banks developed structures to normalize the cash flows.[4]
Starting in the 1990's with some earlier private transactions, securitization technology was applied to
a number of sectors of the reinsurance and insurance markets including life and catastrophe. This
activity grew to nearly $15bn of issuance in 2006 following the disruptions in the underlying markets
caused by Hurricane Katrina and Regulation XXX. Key areas of activity in the broad area of Alternative
Risk Transfer include Catastrophe bonds, Life Insurance Securitization and Reinsurance Sidecars.
As estimated by the Bond Market Association, in the United States, total amount outstanding at the end
of 2004 at $1.8 trillion. This amount is about 8 percent of total outstanding bond market debt ($23.6
trillion), about 33 percent of mortgage-related debt ($5.5 trillion), and about 39 percent of corporate
debt ($4.7 trillion) in the United States. In nominal terms, over the last ten years, (1995-2004,) ABS
amount outstanding has grown about 19 percent annually, with mortgage-related debt and corporate debt
each growing at about 9 percent. Gross public issuance of asset-backed securities remains strong,
setting new records in many years. In 2004, issuance was at an all-time record of about $0.9 trillion.
[12]
At the end of 2004, the larger sectors of this market are credit card-backed securities (21 percent),
home-equity backed securities (25 percent), automobile-backed securities (13 percent), and
collateralized debt obligations (15 percent). Among the other market segments are student loan-backed
securities (6 percent), equipment leases (4 percent), manufactured housing (2 percent), small business
loans (such as loans to convenience stores and gas stations), and aircraft leases. [12]
Credit/default: Default risk is generally accepted as a borrower’s inability to meet interest payment
obligations on time. For ABS, default may occur when maintenance obligations on the underlying
collateral are not sufficiently met as detailed in its prospectus. A key indicator of a particular
security’s default risk is its credit rating. Different tranches within the ABS are rated differently,
with senior classes of most issues receiving the highest rating, and subordinated classes receiving
correspondingly lower credit ratings.[7]
Event risk
Prepayment/reinvestment/early amortization: The majority of revolving ABS are subject to some degree of
early amortization risk. The risk stems from specific early amortization events or payout events that
cause the security to be paid off prematurely. Typically, payout events include insufficient payments
from the underlying borrowers, insufficient excess Fixed Income Sectors: Asset-Backed Securities spread,
a rise in the default rate on the underlying loans above a specified level, a decrease in credit
enhancements below a specific level, and bankruptcy on the part of the sponsor or servicer.[7]
Currency interest rate fluctuations: Like all fixed income securities, the prices of fixed rate ABS move
in response to changes in interest rates. Fluctuations in interest rates affect floating rate ABS prices
less than fixed rate securities, as the index against which the ABS rate adjusts will reflect interest
rate changes in the economy. Furthermore, interest rate changes may affect the prepayment rates on
underlying loans that back some types of ABS, which can affect yields. Home equity loans tend to be the
most sensitive to changes in interest rates, while auto loans, student loans, and credit cards are
generally less sensitive to interest rates.[7]
Contractual agreements
Moral hazard: Investors usually rely on the deal manager to price the securitizations’ underlying
assets. If the manager earns fees based on performance, there may be a temptation to mark up the prices
of the portfolio assets. Conflicts of interest can also arise with senior note holders when the manager
has a claim on the deal's excess spread.[9]
Servicer risk: The transfer or collection of payments may be delayed or reduced if the servicer becomes
insolvent. This risk is mitigated by having a backup servicer involved in the transaction.[7]
History
"Asset securitization began with the structured financing of mortgage pools in the 1970s. For decades
before that, banks were essentially portfolio lenders; they held loans until they matured or were paid
off. These loans were funded principally by deposits, and sometimes by debt, which was a direct
obligation of the bank (rather than a claim on specific assets). But after World War II, depository
institutions simply could not keep pace with the rising demand for housing credit. Banks, as well as
other financial intermediaries sensing a market opportunity, sought ways of increasing the sources of
mortgage funding. To attract investors, investment bankers eventually developed an investment vehicle
that isolated defined mortgage pools, segmented the credit risk, and structured the cash flows from the
underlying loans. Although it took several years to develop efficient mortgage securitization
structures, loan originators quickly realized the process was readily transferable to other types of
loans as well."[4]
In February 1970, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development created the transaction using a
mortgage-backed security. The Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA or Ginnie Mae) sold
securities backed by a portfolio of mortgage loans. [10]
To facilitate the securitization of non-mortgage assets, businesses substituted private credit
enhancements. First, they over-collateralized pools of assets; shortly thereafter, they improved third-
party and structural enhancements. In 1985, securitization techniques that had been developed in the
mortgage market were applied for the first time to a class of non-mortgage assets — automobile loans. A
pool of assets second only to mortgages in volume, auto loans were a good match for structured finance;
their maturities, considerably shorter than those of mortgages, made the timing of cash flows more
predictable, and their long statistical histories of performance gave investors confidence.[4]
This early auto loan deal was a $60 million securitization originated by Marine Midland Bank and
securitized in 1985 by the Certificate for Automobile Receivables Trust (CARS, 1985-1).[11]
The first significant bank credit card sale came to market in 1986 with a private placement of $50
million of outstanding bank card loans. This transaction demonstrated to investors that, if the yields
were high enough, loan pools could support asset sales with higher expected losses and administrative
costs than was true within the mortgage market. Sales of this type — with no contractual obligation by
the seller to provide recourse — allowed banks to receive sales treatment for accounting and regulatory
purposes (easing balance sheet and capital constraints), while at the same time allowing them to retain
origination and servicing fees. After the success of this initial transaction, investors grew to accept
credit card receivables as collateral, and banks developed structures to normalize the cash flows.[4]
Starting in the 1990's with some earlier private transactions, securitization technology was applied to
a number of sectors of the reinsurance and insurance markets including life and catastrophe. This
activity grew to nearly $15bn of issuance in 2006 following the disruptions in the underlying markets
caused by Hurricane Katrina and Regulation XXX. Key areas of activity in the broad area of Alternative
Risk Transfer include Catastrophe bonds, Life Insurance Securitization and Reinsurance Sidecars.
As estimated by the Bond Market Association, in the United States, total amount outstanding at the end
of 2004 at $1.8 trillion. This amount is about 8 percent of total outstanding bond market debt ($23.6
trillion), about 33 percent of mortgage-related debt ($5.5 trillion), and about 39 percent of corporate
debt ($4.7 trillion) in the United States. In nominal terms, over the last ten years, (1995-2004,) ABS
amount outstanding has grown about 19 percent annually, with mortgage-related debt and corporate debt
each growing at about 9 percent. Gross public issuance of asset-backed securities remains strong,
setting new records in many years. In 2004, issuance was at an all-time record of about $0.9 trillion.
[12]
At the end of 2004, the larger sectors of this market are credit card-backed securities (21 percent),
home-equity backed securities (25 percent), automobile-backed securities (13 percent), and
collateralized debt obligations (15 percent). Among the other market segments are student loan-backed
securities (6 percent), equipment leases (4 percent), manufactured housing (2 percent), small business
loans (such as loans to convenience stores and gas stations), and aircraft leases. [12]
Special types of securitization
Master trust
A master trust is a type of SPV particularly suited to handle revolving credit card balances, and has
the flexibility to handle different securities at different times. In a typical master trust
transaction, an originator of credit card receivables transfers a pool of those receivables to the trust
and then the trust issues securities backed by these receivables. Often there will be many tranched
securities issued by the trust all based on one set of receivables. After this transaction, typically
the originator would continue to service the receivables, in this case the credit cards.
There are various risks involved with master trusts specifically. One risk is that timing of cash flows
promised to investors might be different from timing of payments on the receivables. For example, credit
card-backed securities can have maturities of up to 10 years, but credit card-backed receivables usually
pay off much more quickly. To solve this issue these securities typically have a revolving period, an
accumulation period, and an amortization period. All three of these periods are based on historical
experience of the receivables. During the revolving period, principal payments received on the credit
card balances are used to purchase additional receivables. During the accumulation period, these
payments are accumulated in a separate account. During the amortization period, new payments are passed
through to the investors.
A second risk is that the total investor interests and the seller's interest are limited to receivables
generated by the credit cards, but the seller (originator) owns the accounts. This can cause issues with
how the seller controls the terms and conditions of the accounts. Typically to solve this, there is
language written into the securitization to protect the investors.
A third risk is that payments on the receivables can shrink the pool balance and under-collateralize
total investor interest. To prevent this, often there is a required minimum seller's interest, and if
there was a decrease then an early amortization event would occur.[6]
Issuance trust
In 2000, Citibank introduced a new structure for credit card-backed securities, called an issuance
trust, which does not have limitations, that master trusts sometimes do, that requires each issued
series of securities to have both a senior and subordinate tranche. There are other benefits to a
issuance trust: they provide more flexibility in issuing senior/subordinate securities, can increase
demand because pension funds are eligible to invest in investment-grade securities issued by them, and
they can significantly reduce the cost of issuing securities. Because of these issues, issuance trusts
are now the dominant structure used by major issuers of credit card-backed securities.[6]
Grantor trust
Grantor trusts are typically used in automobile-backed securities and REMICs (Real Estate Mortgage
Investment Conduits). Grantor trusts are very similar to pass-through trusts used in the earlier days of
securitization. An originator pools together loans and sells them to a grantor trust, which issues
classes of securities backed by these loans. Principal and interest received on the loans, after
expenses are taken into account, are passed through to the holders of the securities on a pro-rata
basis.
Owner trust
In an owner trust, there is more flexibility in allocating principal and interest received to different
classes of issued securities. In an owner trust, both interest and principal due to subordinate
securities can be used to pay senior securities. Due to this, owner trusts can tailor maturity, risk and
return profiles of issued securities to investor needs. Usually, any income remaining after expenses is
kept in a reserve account up to a specified level and then after that, all income is returned to the
seller. Owner trusts allow credit risk to be mitigated by over-collateralization by using excess
reserves and excess finance income to prepay securities before principal, which leaves more collateral
for the other classes.
Motives for securitization
Advantages to issuer
Reduces funding costs: Through securitization, a company rated BB but with AAA worthy cash flow would be
able to borrow at possibly AAA rates. This is the number one reason to securitize a cash flow and can
have tremendous impacts on borrowing costs. The difference between BB debt and AAA debt can be multiple
hundreds of basis points. For example, Moody's downgraded Ford Motor Credit's rating in January 2002,
but a senior automobile backed securities issued by Ford Motor Credit in January 2002 and April 2002
continue to be rated AAA, because of the strength of the underlying collateral, and other credit
enhancements.[6]
Reduces asset-liability mismatch: "Depending on the structure chosen, securitization can offer perfect
matched funding by eliminating funding exposure in terms of both duration and pricing basis."[2]
Essentially, in most banks and finance companies, the liability book or the funding is from borrowings.
This often comes at a high cost. Securitization allows such banks and finance companies to create a
self-funded asset book.
Lower capital requirements: Some firms, due to legal, regulatory, or other reasons, have a limit or
range that their leverage is allowed to be. By securitizing some of their assets, which qualifies as a
sale for accounting purposes, these firms will be able to lessen the equity on their balance sheets
while maintaining the "earning power" of the asset.
Locking in profits: For a given block of business, the total profits have not yet emerged and thus
remain uncertain. Once the block has been securitized, the level of profits has now been locked in for
that company, thus the risk of profit not emerging, or the benefit of super-profits, has now been passed
on.
Transfer risks (credit, liquidity, prepayment, reinvestment, asset concentration): Securitization makes
it possible to transfer risks from an entity that does not want to bear it, to one that does. Two good
example of this are Catastrophe Bonds and Entertainment Securitizations. Similarly, by securitizing a
block of business (thereby locking in a degree of profits), the company has effectively freed up its
balance to go out and write more profitable business.
Off balance sheet: Derivatives of many types have in the past been referred to as "off balance sheet."
This term implies that the use of derivatives has no balance sheet impact. While there are differences
among the various accounting standards internationally, there is a general trend towards the requirement
to record derivatives at fair value on the balance sheet. There is also a generally accepted principle
that, where derivatives are being used as a hedge against underlying assets or liabilities, accounting
adjustments are required to ensure that the gain/loss on the hedged instrument is recognized in the
income statement on a similar basis as the underlying assets and liabilities. Certain credit derivatives
products, particularly Credit Default Swaps, now have more or less universally accepted market standard
documentation. In the case of Credit Default Swaps, this documentation has been formulated by the
International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) who have for a long time provided documentation
on how to treat such derivatives on balance sheets.
Earnings: Securitization makes it possible to record an earnings bounce without any real addition to the
firm. When a securitization takes place, there often is a "true sale" that takes place between the
Originator (the parent company) and the SPE. This sale has to be for the market value of the underlying
assets for the "true sale" to stick and thus this sale is reflected on the parent company's balance
sheet, which will boost earnings for that quarter by the amount of the sale. While not illegal in any
respect, this does distort the true earnings of the parent company.
Admissibility: Future cashflows may not get full credit in a company's accounts (life insurance
companies, for example, may not always get full credit for future surpluses in their regulatory balance
sheet), and a securitization effectively turns an admissible future surplus flow into an admissible
immediate cash asset.
Liquidity: Future cashflows may simply be balance sheet items which currently are not available for
spending, whereas once the book has been securitized, the cash would be available for immediate spending
or investment. This also creates a reinvestment book which may well be at better rates.
Disadvantages to issuer
May reduce portfolio quality: If the AAA risks, for example, are being securitized out, this would leave
a materially worse quality of residual risk.
Costs: Securitizations are expensive due to management and system costs, legal fees, underwriting fees,
rating fees and ongoing administration. An allowance for unforeseen costs is usually essential in
securitizations, especially if it is an atypical securitization.
Size limitations: Securitizations often require large scale structuring, and thus may not be cost-
efficient for small and medium transactions.
Risks: Since securitization is a structured transaction, it may include par structures as well as credit
enhancements that are subject to risks of impairment, such as prepayment, as well as credit loss,
especially for structures where there are some retained strips.
Advantages to investors
Opportunity to potentially earn a higher rate of return (on a risk-adjusted basis)
Opportunity to invest in a specific pool of high quality credit-enhanced assets: Due to the stringent
requirements for corporations (for example) to attain high ratings, there is a dearth of highly rated
entities that exist. Securitizations, however, allow for the creation of large quantities of AAA, AA or
A rated bonds, and risk averse institutional investors, or investors that are required to invest in only
highly rated assets, have access to a larger pool of .
Portfolio diversification: Depending on the securitization, hedge funds as well as other institutional
investors tend to like investing in bonds created through Securitizations because they may be
uncorrelated to their other bonds and securities.
Isolation of credit risk from the parent entity: Since the assets that are securitized are isolated (at
least in theory) from the assets of the originating entity, under securitization it may be possible for
the securitization to receive a higher credit rating than the "parent," because the underlying risks are
different. For example, a small bank may be considered more risky than the mortgage loans it makes to
its customers; were the mortgage loans to remain with the bank, the borrowers may effectively be paying
higher interest (or, just as likely, the bank would be paying higher interest to its creditors, and
hence less profitable).
A master trust is a type of SPV particularly suited to handle revolving credit card balances, and has
the flexibility to handle different securities at different times. In a typical master trust
transaction, an originator of credit card receivables transfers a pool of those receivables to the trust
and then the trust issues securities backed by these receivables. Often there will be many tranched
securities issued by the trust all based on one set of receivables. After this transaction, typically
the originator would continue to service the receivables, in this case the credit cards.
There are various risks involved with master trusts specifically. One risk is that timing of cash flows
promised to investors might be different from timing of payments on the receivables. For example, credit
card-backed securities can have maturities of up to 10 years, but credit card-backed receivables usually
pay off much more quickly. To solve this issue these securities typically have a revolving period, an
accumulation period, and an amortization period. All three of these periods are based on historical
experience of the receivables. During the revolving period, principal payments received on the credit
card balances are used to purchase additional receivables. During the accumulation period, these
payments are accumulated in a separate account. During the amortization period, new payments are passed
through to the investors.
A second risk is that the total investor interests and the seller's interest are limited to receivables
generated by the credit cards, but the seller (originator) owns the accounts. This can cause issues with
how the seller controls the terms and conditions of the accounts. Typically to solve this, there is
language written into the securitization to protect the investors.
A third risk is that payments on the receivables can shrink the pool balance and under-collateralize
total investor interest. To prevent this, often there is a required minimum seller's interest, and if
there was a decrease then an early amortization event would occur.[6]
Issuance trust
In 2000, Citibank introduced a new structure for credit card-backed securities, called an issuance
trust, which does not have limitations, that master trusts sometimes do, that requires each issued
series of securities to have both a senior and subordinate tranche. There are other benefits to a
issuance trust: they provide more flexibility in issuing senior/subordinate securities, can increase
demand because pension funds are eligible to invest in investment-grade securities issued by them, and
they can significantly reduce the cost of issuing securities. Because of these issues, issuance trusts
are now the dominant structure used by major issuers of credit card-backed securities.[6]
Grantor trust
Grantor trusts are typically used in automobile-backed securities and REMICs (Real Estate Mortgage
Investment Conduits). Grantor trusts are very similar to pass-through trusts used in the earlier days of
securitization. An originator pools together loans and sells them to a grantor trust, which issues
classes of securities backed by these loans. Principal and interest received on the loans, after
expenses are taken into account, are passed through to the holders of the securities on a pro-rata
basis.
Owner trust
In an owner trust, there is more flexibility in allocating principal and interest received to different
classes of issued securities. In an owner trust, both interest and principal due to subordinate
securities can be used to pay senior securities. Due to this, owner trusts can tailor maturity, risk and
return profiles of issued securities to investor needs. Usually, any income remaining after expenses is
kept in a reserve account up to a specified level and then after that, all income is returned to the
seller. Owner trusts allow credit risk to be mitigated by over-collateralization by using excess
reserves and excess finance income to prepay securities before principal, which leaves more collateral
for the other classes.
Motives for securitization
Advantages to issuer
Reduces funding costs: Through securitization, a company rated BB but with AAA worthy cash flow would be
able to borrow at possibly AAA rates. This is the number one reason to securitize a cash flow and can
have tremendous impacts on borrowing costs. The difference between BB debt and AAA debt can be multiple
hundreds of basis points. For example, Moody's downgraded Ford Motor Credit's rating in January 2002,
but a senior automobile backed securities issued by Ford Motor Credit in January 2002 and April 2002
continue to be rated AAA, because of the strength of the underlying collateral, and other credit
enhancements.[6]
Reduces asset-liability mismatch: "Depending on the structure chosen, securitization can offer perfect
matched funding by eliminating funding exposure in terms of both duration and pricing basis."[2]
Essentially, in most banks and finance companies, the liability book or the funding is from borrowings.
This often comes at a high cost. Securitization allows such banks and finance companies to create a
self-funded asset book.
Lower capital requirements: Some firms, due to legal, regulatory, or other reasons, have a limit or
range that their leverage is allowed to be. By securitizing some of their assets, which qualifies as a
sale for accounting purposes, these firms will be able to lessen the equity on their balance sheets
while maintaining the "earning power" of the asset.
Locking in profits: For a given block of business, the total profits have not yet emerged and thus
remain uncertain. Once the block has been securitized, the level of profits has now been locked in for
that company, thus the risk of profit not emerging, or the benefit of super-profits, has now been passed
on.
Transfer risks (credit, liquidity, prepayment, reinvestment, asset concentration): Securitization makes
it possible to transfer risks from an entity that does not want to bear it, to one that does. Two good
example of this are Catastrophe Bonds and Entertainment Securitizations. Similarly, by securitizing a
block of business (thereby locking in a degree of profits), the company has effectively freed up its
balance to go out and write more profitable business.
Off balance sheet: Derivatives of many types have in the past been referred to as "off balance sheet."
This term implies that the use of derivatives has no balance sheet impact. While there are differences
among the various accounting standards internationally, there is a general trend towards the requirement
to record derivatives at fair value on the balance sheet. There is also a generally accepted principle
that, where derivatives are being used as a hedge against underlying assets or liabilities, accounting
adjustments are required to ensure that the gain/loss on the hedged instrument is recognized in the
income statement on a similar basis as the underlying assets and liabilities. Certain credit derivatives
products, particularly Credit Default Swaps, now have more or less universally accepted market standard
documentation. In the case of Credit Default Swaps, this documentation has been formulated by the
International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) who have for a long time provided documentation
on how to treat such derivatives on balance sheets.
Earnings: Securitization makes it possible to record an earnings bounce without any real addition to the
firm. When a securitization takes place, there often is a "true sale" that takes place between the
Originator (the parent company) and the SPE. This sale has to be for the market value of the underlying
assets for the "true sale" to stick and thus this sale is reflected on the parent company's balance
sheet, which will boost earnings for that quarter by the amount of the sale. While not illegal in any
respect, this does distort the true earnings of the parent company.
Admissibility: Future cashflows may not get full credit in a company's accounts (life insurance
companies, for example, may not always get full credit for future surpluses in their regulatory balance
sheet), and a securitization effectively turns an admissible future surplus flow into an admissible
immediate cash asset.
Liquidity: Future cashflows may simply be balance sheet items which currently are not available for
spending, whereas once the book has been securitized, the cash would be available for immediate spending
or investment. This also creates a reinvestment book which may well be at better rates.
Disadvantages to issuer
May reduce portfolio quality: If the AAA risks, for example, are being securitized out, this would leave
a materially worse quality of residual risk.
Costs: Securitizations are expensive due to management and system costs, legal fees, underwriting fees,
rating fees and ongoing administration. An allowance for unforeseen costs is usually essential in
securitizations, especially if it is an atypical securitization.
Size limitations: Securitizations often require large scale structuring, and thus may not be cost-
efficient for small and medium transactions.
Risks: Since securitization is a structured transaction, it may include par structures as well as credit
enhancements that are subject to risks of impairment, such as prepayment, as well as credit loss,
especially for structures where there are some retained strips.
Advantages to investors
Opportunity to potentially earn a higher rate of return (on a risk-adjusted basis)
Opportunity to invest in a specific pool of high quality credit-enhanced assets: Due to the stringent
requirements for corporations (for example) to attain high ratings, there is a dearth of highly rated
entities that exist. Securitizations, however, allow for the creation of large quantities of AAA, AA or
A rated bonds, and risk averse institutional investors, or investors that are required to invest in only
highly rated assets, have access to a larger pool of .
Portfolio diversification: Depending on the securitization, hedge funds as well as other institutional
investors tend to like investing in bonds created through Securitizations because they may be
uncorrelated to their other bonds and securities.
Isolation of credit risk from the parent entity: Since the assets that are securitized are isolated (at
least in theory) from the assets of the originating entity, under securitization it may be possible for
the securitization to receive a higher credit rating than the "parent," because the underlying risks are
different. For example, a small bank may be considered more risky than the mortgage loans it makes to
its customers; were the mortgage loans to remain with the bank, the borrowers may effectively be paying
higher interest (or, just as likely, the bank would be paying higher interest to its creditors, and
hence less profitable).
Issuance
To be able to buy the assets from the originator, the issuer SPV issues tradable securities to fund the
purchase. Investors purchase the securities, either through a private offering (targeting institutional
investors) or on the open market. The performance of the securities is then directly linked to the
performance of the assets. Credit rating agencies rate the securities which are issued in order to
provide an external perspective on the liabilities being created and help the investor make a more
informed decision.
In transactions with static assets, a depositor will assemble the underlying collateral, help structure
the securities and work with the financial markets in order to sell the securities to investors. The
depositor has taken on added significance under Regulation AB. The depositor typically owns 100% of the
beneficial interest in the issuing entity and is usually the parent or a wholly owned subsidiary of the
parent which initiates the transaction. In transactions with managed (traded) assets, asset managers
assemble the underlying collateral, help structure the securities and work with the financial markets in
order to sell the securities to investors.
Some deals may include a third-party guarantor which provides guarantees or partial guarantees for the
assets, the principal and the interest payments, for a fee.
The securities can be issued with either a fixed interest rate or a floating rate. Fixed rate ABS set
the “coupon” (rate) at the time of issuance, in a fashion similar to corporate bonds. Floating rate
securities may be backed by both amortizing and nonamortizing assets. In contrast to fixed rate
securities, the rates on “floaters” will periodically adjust up or down according to a designated index
such as a U.S. Treasury rate, or, more typically, the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). The
floating rate usually reflects the movement in the index plus an additional fixed margin to cover the
added risk[7]
Credit enhancement and tranching
Unlike conventional corporate bonds which are unsecured, securities generated in a securitization deal
are "credit enhanced," meaning their credit quality is increased above that of the originator's
unsecured debt or underlying asset pool. This increases the likelihood that the investors will receive
cash flows to which they are entitled, and thus causes the securities to have a higher credit rating
than the originator. Some securitizations use external credit enhancement provided by third parties,
such as surety bonds and parental guarantees (although this may introduce a conflict of interest).
Individual securities are often split into tranches, or categorized into varying degrees of
subordination. Each tranche has a different level of credit protection or risk exposure than another:
there is generally a senior (“A”) class of securities and one or more junior subordinated (“B,” “C,”
etc.) classes that function as protective layers for the “A” class. The senior classes have first claim
on the cash that the SPV receives, and the more junior classes only start receiving repayment after the
more senior classes have repaid. Because of the cascading effect between classes, this arrangement is
often referred to as a cash flow waterfall. In the event that the underlying asset pool becomes
insufficient to make payments on the securities (e.g. when loans default within a portfolio of loan
claims), the loss is absorbed first by the subordinated tranches, and the upper-level tranches remain
unaffected until the losses exceed the entire amount of the subordinated tranches. The senior securities
are typically AAA rated, signifying a lower risk, while the lower-credit quality subordinated classes
receive a lower credit rating, signifying a higher risk. [7]
The most junior class (often called the equity class) is the most exposed to payment risk. In some
cases, this is a special type of instrument which is retained by the originator as a potential profit
flow. In some cases the equity class receives no coupon (either fixed or floating), but only the
residual cash flow (if any) after all the other classes have been paid.
There may also be a special class which absorbs early repayments in the underlying assets. This is often
the case where the underlying assets are mortgages which, in essence, are repaid every time the property
is sold. Since any early repayment is passed on to this class, it means the other investors have a more
predictable cash flow.
If the underlying assets are mortgages or loans, there are usually two separate "waterfalls" because the
principal and interest receipts can be easily allocated and matched. But if the assets are income-based
transactions such as rental deals it is not possible to differentiate so easily between how much of the
revenue is income and how much principal repayment. In this case all the income is used to pay the cash
flows due on the bonds as those cash flows become due.
Credit enhancements affect credit risk by providing more or less protection to promised cash flows for a
security. Additional protection can help a security achieve a higher rating, lower protection can help
create new securities with differently desired risks, and these differential protections can help place
a security on more attractive terms.
In addition to subordination, credit may be enhanced through:[6]
* A reserve or spread account, in which funds remaining after expenses such as principal and
interest payments, charge-offs and other fees have been paid-off are accumulated, and can be used when
SPE expenses are greater than its income.
* Third-party insurance, or guarantees of principal and interest payments on the securities.
* Over-collateralization, usually by using finance income to pay off principal on some securities
before principal on the corresponding share of collateral is collected.
* Cash funding or a cash collateral account, generally consisting of short-term, highly rated
investments purchased either from the seller's own funds, or from funds borrowed from third parties that
can be used to make up shortfalls in promised cash flows.
* A third-party letter of credit or corporate guarantee.
* A back-up servicer for the loans.
* Discounted receivables for the pool.
Servicing
A servicer collects payments and monitors the assets that are the crux of the structured financial deal.
The servicer can often be the originator, because the servicer needs very similar expertise as the
originator.
The servicer can significantly affect the cash flows to the investors because it controls the collection
policy, which influences the proceeds collected, the charge-offs and the recoveries on the loans. Any
income remaining after payments and expenses is usually accumulated to some extent in a reserve or
spread account, and any further excess is returned to the seller. Bond rating agencies publish ratings
of asset-backed securities based on the performance of the collateral pool, the credit enhancements and
the probability of default.[6]
When the issuer is structured as a trust, the trustee is a vital part of the deal as the gate-keeper of
the assets that are being held in the issuer. Even though the trustee is part of the SPV, which is
typically wholly owned by the Originator, the trustee has a fiduciary duty to protect the assets and
those who own the assets, typically the investors.
Repayment structures
Unlike corporate bonds, most securitizations are amortized, meaning that the principal amount borrowed
is paid back gradually over the specified term of the loan, rather than in one lump sum at the maturity
of the loan. Fully amortizing securitizations are generally collateralized by fully amortizing assets
such as home equity loans, auto loans, and student loans. Prepayment uncertainty is an important concern
with fully amortizing ABS. The possible rate of prepayment varies widely with the type of underlying
asset pool, so many prepayment models have been developed in an attempt to define common prepayment
activity. The PSA prepayment model is a well-known example. [8][7]
A controlled amortization structure is a method of providing investors with a more predictable repayment
schedule, even though the underlying assets may be nonamortizing. After a predetermined “revolving”
period, during which only interest payments are made, these securitizations attempt to return principal
to investors in a series of defi ned periodic payments, usually within a year. An early amortization
event is the risk of the debt being retired early.[7]
On the other hand, bullet or slug structures return the principal to investors in a single payment. The
most common bullet structure is called the soft bullet, meaning that the final bullet payment is not
guaranteed on the expected maturity date; however, the majority of these securitizations are paid on
time. The second type of bullet structure is the hard bullet, which guarantees that the principal will
be paid on the expected maturity date. Hard bullet structures are less common for two reasons: investors
are comfortable with soft bullet structures, and they are reluctant to accept the lower yields of hard
bullet securities in exchange for a guarantee.[7]
Securitizations are often structured as a sequential pay bond, paid off in a sequential manner based on
maturity. This means that the first tranche, which may have a one-year average life, will receive all
principal payments until it is retired; then the second tranche begins to receive principal, and so
forth.[7] Pro rata bond structures pay each tranche a proportionate share of principal throughout the
life of the security.[7]
purchase. Investors purchase the securities, either through a private offering (targeting institutional
investors) or on the open market. The performance of the securities is then directly linked to the
performance of the assets. Credit rating agencies rate the securities which are issued in order to
provide an external perspective on the liabilities being created and help the investor make a more
informed decision.
In transactions with static assets, a depositor will assemble the underlying collateral, help structure
the securities and work with the financial markets in order to sell the securities to investors. The
depositor has taken on added significance under Regulation AB. The depositor typically owns 100% of the
beneficial interest in the issuing entity and is usually the parent or a wholly owned subsidiary of the
parent which initiates the transaction. In transactions with managed (traded) assets, asset managers
assemble the underlying collateral, help structure the securities and work with the financial markets in
order to sell the securities to investors.
Some deals may include a third-party guarantor which provides guarantees or partial guarantees for the
assets, the principal and the interest payments, for a fee.
The securities can be issued with either a fixed interest rate or a floating rate. Fixed rate ABS set
the “coupon” (rate) at the time of issuance, in a fashion similar to corporate bonds. Floating rate
securities may be backed by both amortizing and nonamortizing assets. In contrast to fixed rate
securities, the rates on “floaters” will periodically adjust up or down according to a designated index
such as a U.S. Treasury rate, or, more typically, the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). The
floating rate usually reflects the movement in the index plus an additional fixed margin to cover the
added risk[7]
Credit enhancement and tranching
Unlike conventional corporate bonds which are unsecured, securities generated in a securitization deal
are "credit enhanced," meaning their credit quality is increased above that of the originator's
unsecured debt or underlying asset pool. This increases the likelihood that the investors will receive
cash flows to which they are entitled, and thus causes the securities to have a higher credit rating
than the originator. Some securitizations use external credit enhancement provided by third parties,
such as surety bonds and parental guarantees (although this may introduce a conflict of interest).
Individual securities are often split into tranches, or categorized into varying degrees of
subordination. Each tranche has a different level of credit protection or risk exposure than another:
there is generally a senior (“A”) class of securities and one or more junior subordinated (“B,” “C,”
etc.) classes that function as protective layers for the “A” class. The senior classes have first claim
on the cash that the SPV receives, and the more junior classes only start receiving repayment after the
more senior classes have repaid. Because of the cascading effect between classes, this arrangement is
often referred to as a cash flow waterfall. In the event that the underlying asset pool becomes
insufficient to make payments on the securities (e.g. when loans default within a portfolio of loan
claims), the loss is absorbed first by the subordinated tranches, and the upper-level tranches remain
unaffected until the losses exceed the entire amount of the subordinated tranches. The senior securities
are typically AAA rated, signifying a lower risk, while the lower-credit quality subordinated classes
receive a lower credit rating, signifying a higher risk. [7]
The most junior class (often called the equity class) is the most exposed to payment risk. In some
cases, this is a special type of instrument which is retained by the originator as a potential profit
flow. In some cases the equity class receives no coupon (either fixed or floating), but only the
residual cash flow (if any) after all the other classes have been paid.
There may also be a special class which absorbs early repayments in the underlying assets. This is often
the case where the underlying assets are mortgages which, in essence, are repaid every time the property
is sold. Since any early repayment is passed on to this class, it means the other investors have a more
predictable cash flow.
If the underlying assets are mortgages or loans, there are usually two separate "waterfalls" because the
principal and interest receipts can be easily allocated and matched. But if the assets are income-based
transactions such as rental deals it is not possible to differentiate so easily between how much of the
revenue is income and how much principal repayment. In this case all the income is used to pay the cash
flows due on the bonds as those cash flows become due.
Credit enhancements affect credit risk by providing more or less protection to promised cash flows for a
security. Additional protection can help a security achieve a higher rating, lower protection can help
create new securities with differently desired risks, and these differential protections can help place
a security on more attractive terms.
In addition to subordination, credit may be enhanced through:[6]
* A reserve or spread account, in which funds remaining after expenses such as principal and
interest payments, charge-offs and other fees have been paid-off are accumulated, and can be used when
SPE expenses are greater than its income.
* Third-party insurance, or guarantees of principal and interest payments on the securities.
* Over-collateralization, usually by using finance income to pay off principal on some securities
before principal on the corresponding share of collateral is collected.
* Cash funding or a cash collateral account, generally consisting of short-term, highly rated
investments purchased either from the seller's own funds, or from funds borrowed from third parties that
can be used to make up shortfalls in promised cash flows.
* A third-party letter of credit or corporate guarantee.
* A back-up servicer for the loans.
* Discounted receivables for the pool.
Servicing
A servicer collects payments and monitors the assets that are the crux of the structured financial deal.
The servicer can often be the originator, because the servicer needs very similar expertise as the
originator.
The servicer can significantly affect the cash flows to the investors because it controls the collection
policy, which influences the proceeds collected, the charge-offs and the recoveries on the loans. Any
income remaining after payments and expenses is usually accumulated to some extent in a reserve or
spread account, and any further excess is returned to the seller. Bond rating agencies publish ratings
of asset-backed securities based on the performance of the collateral pool, the credit enhancements and
the probability of default.[6]
When the issuer is structured as a trust, the trustee is a vital part of the deal as the gate-keeper of
the assets that are being held in the issuer. Even though the trustee is part of the SPV, which is
typically wholly owned by the Originator, the trustee has a fiduciary duty to protect the assets and
those who own the assets, typically the investors.
Repayment structures
Unlike corporate bonds, most securitizations are amortized, meaning that the principal amount borrowed
is paid back gradually over the specified term of the loan, rather than in one lump sum at the maturity
of the loan. Fully amortizing securitizations are generally collateralized by fully amortizing assets
such as home equity loans, auto loans, and student loans. Prepayment uncertainty is an important concern
with fully amortizing ABS. The possible rate of prepayment varies widely with the type of underlying
asset pool, so many prepayment models have been developed in an attempt to define common prepayment
activity. The PSA prepayment model is a well-known example. [8][7]
A controlled amortization structure is a method of providing investors with a more predictable repayment
schedule, even though the underlying assets may be nonamortizing. After a predetermined “revolving”
period, during which only interest payments are made, these securitizations attempt to return principal
to investors in a series of defi ned periodic payments, usually within a year. An early amortization
event is the risk of the debt being retired early.[7]
On the other hand, bullet or slug structures return the principal to investors in a single payment. The
most common bullet structure is called the soft bullet, meaning that the final bullet payment is not
guaranteed on the expected maturity date; however, the majority of these securitizations are paid on
time. The second type of bullet structure is the hard bullet, which guarantees that the principal will
be paid on the expected maturity date. Hard bullet structures are less common for two reasons: investors
are comfortable with soft bullet structures, and they are reluctant to accept the lower yields of hard
bullet securities in exchange for a guarantee.[7]
Securitizations are often structured as a sequential pay bond, paid off in a sequential manner based on
maturity. This means that the first tranche, which may have a one-year average life, will receive all
principal payments until it is retired; then the second tranche begins to receive principal, and so
forth.[7] Pro rata bond structures pay each tranche a proportionate share of principal throughout the
life of the security.[7]
Securitization
Securitization is a structured finance process in which assets, receivables or financial instruments are
acquired, classified into pools, and offered as collateral for third-party investment.[1] It involves
the selling of financial instruments which are backed by the cash flow or value of the underlying
assets.[2]
Securitization typically applies to assets that are illiquid (i.e. cannot easily be sold). It is common
in the real estate industry, where it is applied to pools of leased property, and in the lending
industry, where it is applied to lenders' claims on mortgages, home equity loans, student loans and
other debts.
Any assets can be securitized so long as they are associated with a steady amount of cash flow.
Investors "buy" these assets by making loans which are secured against the underlying pool of assets and
its associated income stream. Securitization thus "converts illiquid assets into liquid assets"[3] by
pooling, underwriting and selling their ownership in the form of asset-backed securities (ABS).[4]
Securitization utilizes a special purpose vehicle (SPV) (alternatively known as a special purpose entity
[SPE] or special purpose company [SPC]) in order to reduce the risk of bankruptcy and thereby obtain
lower interest rates from potential lenders. A credit derivative is also generally used to change the
credit quality of the underlying portfolio so that it will be acceptable to the final investors.
Securitization has evolved from tentative beginnings in the late 1970s to a vital funding source with an
estimated total aggregate outstanding of $8.06 trillion (as of the end of 2005, by the Bond Market
Association) and new issuance of $3.07 trillion in 2005 in the U.S. markets alone.[citation needed]
Structure
The diagram describes a typical transaction with this separate company (usually referred to as a Special
Purpose Vehicle SPV or in the USA as a Special Purpose Entity SPE
The diagram describes a typical transaction with this separate company (usually referred to as a Special
Purpose Vehicle SPV or in the USA as a Special Purpose Entity SPE
Pooling and transfer
The originator initially owns the assets engaged in the deal. This is typically a company looking to
either raise capital, restructure debt or otherwise adjust its finances. Under traditional corporate
finance concepts, such a company would have three options to raise new capital: a loan, bond issuance,
or issuance of stock. However, stock offerings dilute the ownership and control of the company, while
loan or bond financing is often prohibitively expensive due to the credit rating of the company and the
associated rise in interest rates.
The consistently revenue-generating part of the company may have a much higher credit rating than the
company as a whole. For instance, a leasing company may have provided $10m nominal value of leases, and
it will receive a cash flow over the next five years from these. It cannot demand early repayment on the
leases and so cannot get its money back early if required. If it could sell the rights to the cash flows
from the leases to someone else, it could transform that income stream into a lump sum today (in effect,
receiving today the present value of a future cash flow). Where the originator is a bank or other
organization that must meet capital adequacy requirements, the structure is usually more complex because
a separate company is set up to buy the debts.
A suitably large portfolio of assets is "pooled" and sold to a special purpose vehicle (the issuer), a
tax-exempt company or trust formed for the specific purpose of funding the assets. Once the assets are
transferred to the issuer, there is normally no recourse to the originator. The issuer is "bankruptcy
remote," meaning that if the originator goes into bankruptcy, the assets of the issuer will not be
distributed to the creditors of the originator. In order to achieve this, the governing documents of the
issuer restrict its activities to only those necessary to complete the issuance of securities.
Accounting standards govern when such a transfer is a sale, a financing, a partial sale, or a part-sale
and part-financing.[5] In a sale, the originator is allowed to remove the transferred assets from its
balance sheet: in a financing, the assets are considered to remain the property of the originator.[6]
Under US accounting standards, the originator achieves a sale by being at arm's length from the issuer,
in which case the issuer is classified as a "qualifying special purpose entity" or "qSPE".
Because of these structural issues, the originator typically needs the help of an investment bank (the
arranger) in setting up the structure of the transaction.
acquired, classified into pools, and offered as collateral for third-party investment.[1] It involves
the selling of financial instruments which are backed by the cash flow or value of the underlying
assets.[2]
Securitization typically applies to assets that are illiquid (i.e. cannot easily be sold). It is common
in the real estate industry, where it is applied to pools of leased property, and in the lending
industry, where it is applied to lenders' claims on mortgages, home equity loans, student loans and
other debts.
Any assets can be securitized so long as they are associated with a steady amount of cash flow.
Investors "buy" these assets by making loans which are secured against the underlying pool of assets and
its associated income stream. Securitization thus "converts illiquid assets into liquid assets"[3] by
pooling, underwriting and selling their ownership in the form of asset-backed securities (ABS).[4]
Securitization utilizes a special purpose vehicle (SPV) (alternatively known as a special purpose entity
[SPE] or special purpose company [SPC]) in order to reduce the risk of bankruptcy and thereby obtain
lower interest rates from potential lenders. A credit derivative is also generally used to change the
credit quality of the underlying portfolio so that it will be acceptable to the final investors.
Securitization has evolved from tentative beginnings in the late 1970s to a vital funding source with an
estimated total aggregate outstanding of $8.06 trillion (as of the end of 2005, by the Bond Market
Association) and new issuance of $3.07 trillion in 2005 in the U.S. markets alone.[citation needed]
Structure
The diagram describes a typical transaction with this separate company (usually referred to as a Special
Purpose Vehicle SPV or in the USA as a Special Purpose Entity SPE
The diagram describes a typical transaction with this separate company (usually referred to as a Special
Purpose Vehicle SPV or in the USA as a Special Purpose Entity SPE
Pooling and transfer
The originator initially owns the assets engaged in the deal. This is typically a company looking to
either raise capital, restructure debt or otherwise adjust its finances. Under traditional corporate
finance concepts, such a company would have three options to raise new capital: a loan, bond issuance,
or issuance of stock. However, stock offerings dilute the ownership and control of the company, while
loan or bond financing is often prohibitively expensive due to the credit rating of the company and the
associated rise in interest rates.
The consistently revenue-generating part of the company may have a much higher credit rating than the
company as a whole. For instance, a leasing company may have provided $10m nominal value of leases, and
it will receive a cash flow over the next five years from these. It cannot demand early repayment on the
leases and so cannot get its money back early if required. If it could sell the rights to the cash flows
from the leases to someone else, it could transform that income stream into a lump sum today (in effect,
receiving today the present value of a future cash flow). Where the originator is a bank or other
organization that must meet capital adequacy requirements, the structure is usually more complex because
a separate company is set up to buy the debts.
A suitably large portfolio of assets is "pooled" and sold to a special purpose vehicle (the issuer), a
tax-exempt company or trust formed for the specific purpose of funding the assets. Once the assets are
transferred to the issuer, there is normally no recourse to the originator. The issuer is "bankruptcy
remote," meaning that if the originator goes into bankruptcy, the assets of the issuer will not be
distributed to the creditors of the originator. In order to achieve this, the governing documents of the
issuer restrict its activities to only those necessary to complete the issuance of securities.
Accounting standards govern when such a transfer is a sale, a financing, a partial sale, or a part-sale
and part-financing.[5] In a sale, the originator is allowed to remove the transferred assets from its
balance sheet: in a financing, the assets are considered to remain the property of the originator.[6]
Under US accounting standards, the originator achieves a sale by being at arm's length from the issuer,
in which case the issuer is classified as a "qualifying special purpose entity" or "qSPE".
Because of these structural issues, the originator typically needs the help of an investment bank (the
arranger) in setting up the structure of the transaction.
A Home Equity Line of Credit
A Home Equity Line of Credit (often called HELOC, pronounced HEE-lock) is a loan in which the lender
agrees to lend a maximum amount within an agreed period (called a term), where the collateral is the
borrower's equity in his/her house.
A HELOC differs from a conventional home equity loan in that the borrower is not advanced the entire sum
up front, but uses the line of credit to borrow sums that total no more than the amount, similar to a
credit card. At closing you are assigned a specified credit limit that you can borrow up to. During a
"draw period" (typically 5 to 25 years), HELOC funds can be borrowed and you pay back only what you use
plus interest. Depending on how much you use the HELOC, you will have a minimum monthly payment
requirement (often "interest only"); beyond the minimum, it is up to you how much to pay and when to
pay. At the end of the draw period, you will have to pay back the full principal amount borrowed either
in a lump-sum balloon payment or according to a loan amortization schedule.
Another important difference from a conventional loan: the interest rate on a HELOC is variable based on
an index such as prime rate. This means that the interest rate can - and almost certainly will - change
over time. Homeowners shopping for a HELOC must be aware that not all lenders calculate the margin the
same way. The margin is the difference between the prime rate and the interest rate the borrower will
actually pay. Lenders do not generally offer this information and it is up to the consumer to ask for it
before taking a loan.
HELOC loans have become very popular in the United States in the 2000s, in part because interest paid is
typically (depending on specific circumstances) deductible under federal and many state income tax laws.
This effectively reduces the cost of borrowing funds. Another reason for the popularity of HELOCs is the
flexibility not found in most other loans - both in terms of borrowing and repaying on a schedule
determined by the borrower. Furthermore, HELOC loans' popularity growth may also stem from their having
a better image than a "second mortgage," a term which can more directly imply an undesirable level of
debt.
It must always be kept in mind that the underlying collateral of a home equity line of credit (HELOC) is
the home. This means that failure to repay the loan or meet loan requirements may result in foreclosure.
agrees to lend a maximum amount within an agreed period (called a term), where the collateral is the
borrower's equity in his/her house.
A HELOC differs from a conventional home equity loan in that the borrower is not advanced the entire sum
up front, but uses the line of credit to borrow sums that total no more than the amount, similar to a
credit card. At closing you are assigned a specified credit limit that you can borrow up to. During a
"draw period" (typically 5 to 25 years), HELOC funds can be borrowed and you pay back only what you use
plus interest. Depending on how much you use the HELOC, you will have a minimum monthly payment
requirement (often "interest only"); beyond the minimum, it is up to you how much to pay and when to
pay. At the end of the draw period, you will have to pay back the full principal amount borrowed either
in a lump-sum balloon payment or according to a loan amortization schedule.
Another important difference from a conventional loan: the interest rate on a HELOC is variable based on
an index such as prime rate. This means that the interest rate can - and almost certainly will - change
over time. Homeowners shopping for a HELOC must be aware that not all lenders calculate the margin the
same way. The margin is the difference between the prime rate and the interest rate the borrower will
actually pay. Lenders do not generally offer this information and it is up to the consumer to ask for it
before taking a loan.
HELOC loans have become very popular in the United States in the 2000s, in part because interest paid is
typically (depending on specific circumstances) deductible under federal and many state income tax laws.
This effectively reduces the cost of borrowing funds. Another reason for the popularity of HELOCs is the
flexibility not found in most other loans - both in terms of borrowing and repaying on a schedule
determined by the borrower. Furthermore, HELOC loans' popularity growth may also stem from their having
a better image than a "second mortgage," a term which can more directly imply an undesirable level of
debt.
It must always be kept in mind that the underlying collateral of a home equity line of credit (HELOC) is
the home. This means that failure to repay the loan or meet loan requirements may result in foreclosure.
A home equity loan1
A home equity loan (sometimes abbreviated HEL) is a type of loan in which the borrower uses the equity
in their home as collateral. These loans are sometimes useful to help finance major home repairs,
medical bills or college education. A home equity loan creates a lien against the borrower's house, and
reduces actual home equity.
Home equity loans are most commonly second position liens (second trust deed), although they can be held
in first or, less commonly, third position. Most home equity loans require good to excellent credit
history, and reasonable loan-to-value and combined loan-to-value ratios. Home equity loans come in two
types, closed end and open end.
Both are usually referred to as second mortgages, because they are secured against the value of the
property, just like a traditional mortgage. Home equity loans and lines of credit are usually, but not
always, for a shorter term than first mortgages. In the United States, it is sometimes possible to
deduct home equity loan interest on one's personal income taxes.
Closed end home equity loan
The borrower receives a lump sum at the time of the closing and cannot borrow further. The maximum
amount of money that can be borrowed is determined by variables including credit history, income, and
the appraised value of the collateral, among others. It is common to be able to borrow up to 100% of the
appraised value of the home, less any liens, although there are lenders that will go above 100% when
doing over-equity loans. However, state law governs in this area; for example, Texas (which was, for
many years, the only state to not allow home equity loans) only allows borrowing up to 80% of equity.
Closed-end home equity loans generally have fixed rates and can be amortized for periods usually up to
15 years. Some home equity loans offer reduced amortization whereby at the end of the term, a balloon
payment is due. These larger lump-sum payments can be avoided by paying above the minimum payment or
refinancing the loan.
Open end home equity loan
This is a revolving credit loan, also referred to as a home equity line of credit (HELOC), where the
borrower can choose when and how often to borrow against the equity in the property, with the lender
setting an initial limit to the credit line based on criteria similar to those used for closed-end
loans. Like the closed-end loan, it may be possible to borrow up to 100% of the value of a home, less
any liens. These lines of credit are available up to 30 years, usually at a variable interest rate. The
minimum monthly payment can be as low as only the interest that is due.
Typically, the interest rate is based on the Prime rate plus a margin.
Home Equity Loan Fees
Here is a brief list of possible fees that may apply to your home equity loan: Appraisal fees,
originator fees, title fees, stamp duties, arrangement fees, closing fees, early pay-off and other costs
are often included in loans. Surveyor and conveyor or valuation fees may also apply to loans, some may
be waived. The survey or conveyor and valuation costs can often be reduced, provided you find your own
licensed surveyor to inspect the property considered for purchase. The title charges in secondary
mortgages or equity loans are often fees for renewing the title information. Most loans will have fees
of some sort, so make sure you read and ask several questions about the fees that are charged.
in their home as collateral. These loans are sometimes useful to help finance major home repairs,
medical bills or college education. A home equity loan creates a lien against the borrower's house, and
reduces actual home equity.
Home equity loans are most commonly second position liens (second trust deed), although they can be held
in first or, less commonly, third position. Most home equity loans require good to excellent credit
history, and reasonable loan-to-value and combined loan-to-value ratios. Home equity loans come in two
types, closed end and open end.
Both are usually referred to as second mortgages, because they are secured against the value of the
property, just like a traditional mortgage. Home equity loans and lines of credit are usually, but not
always, for a shorter term than first mortgages. In the United States, it is sometimes possible to
deduct home equity loan interest on one's personal income taxes.
Closed end home equity loan
The borrower receives a lump sum at the time of the closing and cannot borrow further. The maximum
amount of money that can be borrowed is determined by variables including credit history, income, and
the appraised value of the collateral, among others. It is common to be able to borrow up to 100% of the
appraised value of the home, less any liens, although there are lenders that will go above 100% when
doing over-equity loans. However, state law governs in this area; for example, Texas (which was, for
many years, the only state to not allow home equity loans) only allows borrowing up to 80% of equity.
Closed-end home equity loans generally have fixed rates and can be amortized for periods usually up to
15 years. Some home equity loans offer reduced amortization whereby at the end of the term, a balloon
payment is due. These larger lump-sum payments can be avoided by paying above the minimum payment or
refinancing the loan.
Open end home equity loan
This is a revolving credit loan, also referred to as a home equity line of credit (HELOC), where the
borrower can choose when and how often to borrow against the equity in the property, with the lender
setting an initial limit to the credit line based on criteria similar to those used for closed-end
loans. Like the closed-end loan, it may be possible to borrow up to 100% of the value of a home, less
any liens. These lines of credit are available up to 30 years, usually at a variable interest rate. The
minimum monthly payment can be as low as only the interest that is due.
Typically, the interest rate is based on the Prime rate plus a margin.
Home Equity Loan Fees
Here is a brief list of possible fees that may apply to your home equity loan: Appraisal fees,
originator fees, title fees, stamp duties, arrangement fees, closing fees, early pay-off and other costs
are often included in loans. Surveyor and conveyor or valuation fees may also apply to loans, some may
be waived. The survey or conveyor and valuation costs can often be reduced, provided you find your own
licensed surveyor to inspect the property considered for purchase. The title charges in secondary
mortgages or equity loans are often fees for renewing the title information. Most loans will have fees
of some sort, so make sure you read and ask several questions about the fees that are charged.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)